Woodhill Park Retreat - Articles - Scholarship Resources

The Ed. Doc. process: a magical, mystery tour: Part One: Learning to balance on jelly

no@spam.com (Jo Perry) — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:36:05 CDT

The pathway I followed had one paper in each semester, each ending with a 10,000 word report, presentation and oral defence with external examiners, advisors and peers. ‘Oral Defence?’ Presentation = Power Point = black hole = end of my doctorate. Or so I thought.

After the first sentence of my first oral defence (for defence, read inquisition), the words just vanished, the cogency of the presentation evaporated, the Ed. Doc. went down the gurglers within my mind and I went home absolutely and utterly shattered. And then later, Advisor Two declared, “Pick one theory and only one theory” but Advisor One thankfully said, “It’s your project" These two snippets are but a part of the story...

This paper is about how one person survived the trials and tribulations of the first two years of the Ed. Doc. process.

Information for ECE students at Waiariki on Educational Policies, Regulations, the law, etc.

no@spam.com (Dr. Jens J. Hansen) — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:53:27 CDT

I've put some material about educational policies and educational law onto my site for a while. It's a short-term resource because people received it in hard copy. So for those who want to, enjoy it whilst you can. Click here to access.

By way of background, the material derived from work that I did for the Master of Educational Management at Unitec - work originally written by me but considerably modified for this ECE course at Waiariki.

How to critically review the literature - a must for your thesis.

no@spam.com (Drs. Hansen and Smith ) — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:34:59 CST

Here are some resources on generating a critical literature review - and please note the emphasis is on the word critical. Many thesis writers and researchers simply give an account of what the literature proposes and forget about critiquing the materials they review. This material includes a link to some teaching material developed by Drs. Jens Hansen and Richard Smith. It also discusses fundamental steps to critiquing reviewed literature.

Beginner’s guide to writing a persuasive academic abstract

no@spam.com (Dr. Jens J. Hansen) — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:18:15 CST

This is a two page guide to writing an abstract effectively. An academic abstract is a miniature work of art. Abstracts are not always produced as a summarising version of completed academic labour; instead, they frequently espouse academic intentions to deliver scholastic outputs and/or research outcomes in time for a scheduled event.

A robust abstract, addresses four central questions which ask What is it about?; What did you do?; What did you find? and, How is that important? An abstract that is concentrated is potent and potency heralds resolute work. A well constructed abstract is staunch writing that conveys maximum meaning through minimum words.